Farming liquid air as major energy commodity

§1. Prelude

Now the farming season is coming in Canada, but I decide no longer farm my near 100 acres land for any crop, because fertilizer & diesel prices are upsoaring so crazy!

However I will still farm a few of acres for my own family food supply.

Since politician AOC blamed farmers' cattle/cow cause global warming by flatulence, I have emptied my livestock, though only reserve a minimal for family consumption, as we don't eat artificial meat promoted by Bill Gates.

Recently our Premier Minister Trudeau is blaming grain growers as worst emissions offenders, so I guess some farmers may fallow their farmland, then rely on government climate-incentive benefits.

In the past years, my farming income have well supported my farmhouse-based private cleantech R&D laboratory, though farming activity did distract my effort on science and technology.

Now, without farming income support, I have to resort to external funds to continue my cleantech innovation, or may consider to port / transplant my current R&D project to a job offer with attractive compensation by a big tech or institute, even relocation is acceptable.

§2. Green energy economic cycle

With my recent great R&D progress, maybe soon I will re-farm my land for a special "energy crop" — cryogenic LN (Liquid Nitrogen).

I am researching the possibility of green energy economic cycle based on LN on-farm production and hybrid power consumption.

a. The production:

Farmers use "seed" LN to produce more LN by special liquefaction machine, which is powered by a heat engine, burning biomass e.g. grass/straw/wood, and the "seed" LN is consumed as heat sink.

Why seed LN during LN production? because per Carnot's theorem, the lower the heat sink temperature, and/or the higher the heat source temperature, then the higher the heat engine efficiency.

Farmers LN production can be year-round business operation, no matter cold winter or hot summer.

In farming seasons, they will be very busy to cope with 2 tasks: growing energy grass and continuing LN production; the first task include, but not limit to: seeding, crop management, harvest, shredding, and store in barns or coverall structures.

The LN production line keeps constant rate of biomass consumption, therefore surplus biomass in summer can be consumed in winter.

b. The consumption:

* The first is in HVAC, or say: heating, ventilation, cooler or air conditioner; as LN is extremely cold -196°C, so it's OK to simply circulate LN in evaporator for cooling purpose, then emit itself as exhaust i.e. nitrogen gas, the major component of air.

Though it's against intuition to heat a space via LN, however, the high efficient LN heating is still possible, and is nearly tantamount to direct burning fuels. I will further address this magic application in later section.

Optionally, the Combined Cool & Power can generate by indoor air slowly heating LN, so as to provide auxiliary electricity for itself control panel & fan, even with surplus.

* The 2nd is in power generation, e.g. next generation external combustion engines, electricity generators.

These applications consume LN as heat sink, plus externally burn fuels (biomass, coal, gasoline, or heating oil) to overheat LN up to at least 300°C, then get hundreds atmosphere pressure to output torque power.

By consuming both fuel and LN, it can save tremendous fuel!

For example: a regular car fuel economy 30MPG will become 100MPG if using gasoline + LN hybrid power.

One day in the future, most farms can produce and sell LN all over the world, then, without any fossil fuel, I can drive my biomass-LN-powered car from Canada to Mexico, just loading some initial woodchips & 100L LN tank, then intermittently buying woodchips & LN in midways from any farm alongside roads.

c. Circular economy with two mutual-mirrored open loops

LN consumption is an open loop with emission of exhausted nitrogen gas, e.g. if used in LN-heat-sunk heat engine, it's the thermodynamic half of a closed-loop cycle.

LN regeneration is an open loop with re-liquefaction of nitrogen gas,just like as a mirrored one of LN consumption open loop, in the heat-pumpish dynamothermic half of a closed-loop cycle.

Only LN Farmers need assemble the two mutual-mirrored open loops in tandem, so as to indirectly convert biomass heat of combustion to cryogenic liquid air in max efficiency.

Natural macro scale atmosphere diffusion or circulation connects the two open loops together, regardless of geographic span, rendering effect of circular economy.

All LN consumption will improve energy efficiency, and the significant efficiency improvement is attributed to the piggyback of solar energy accumulated on farmland during plant life cycle with photosynthesis.

Fossil energy or whatever other sources of energy and farmers' piggybacked solar energy will share and benefit from this circular economy.

For normal boost of efficiency from 25% to 90% in cryogenic-heatsunk engine, such share will cut down fossil energy usage by half even 70% off.

So in a sense, it's not fossil energy piggybacking solar energy behind farmed LN, but solar energy behind farmed LN piggybacking fossil energy.

d. My preliminary estimation:

In a properly equipped farm with my proprietary heat engine and Linde process liquefaction machine, the LN net gain is about 42%, and the equation of heat engine as input => liquefaction output:

consuming 1kg LN as "seed" + 0.2kg biomass as fuel => produce 1.42kg LN

or by other perspective:

5kg LN as "seed" + 1kg biomass as fuel => produce 7kg LN

It means: burning 1kg biomass can get 7 - 5 = 2kg net gain LN.

In other words, depositing 1kg LN for sale after deduction of the seeding LN for sustainable production, will consume at least 1/2 = 0.5kg biomass.

Because gasoline' heat value is roughly 2 times of biomass' heat value, so by equivalence:

1kg marketable LN's heat cost = 0.5kg biomass = 0.25kg gasoline

The LN net gain 42% looks like small, or say, the self-consumption seems as high as 1/1.42 = 70% in the power side of the tandem of heat engine + liquefier, but you will feel normal on the high deduction, if compare with the almost same high tax rate in Canada or most welfare states.

This LN production-consumption economic cycle is carbon neutral, or net-zero, as growing biomass can absorb CO2, though burning it emit CO2, i.e. carbon source of the heat engine is counter-cancelled by carbon sink of energy crops on farmland with 1 year delay.

§3. It’s not mandate to consume LN as seed for LN production

Almost all heat engines use atmosphere as heat sink, e.g. a regular external combustion engine works like this: burning biomass to generate water steam → steam propel turbine → output torque power → emit exhaust vapor to atmosphere.

In order to extract as much as possible mechanical energy from heat flow, or say for a decent efficiency, steam temperature must be very high; however, for so-so temperature in most Watt steam engines, efficiency is deplorably under 10%. Burning biomass in such heat engine is just a little bit better than wildfire, in sense of impact on environment; so it is never my choice.

Traditional LN industrial production only consume electric power to do liquefaction Linde process, but it's not feasible for LN farmers to consume huge electricity.

So it's only the viable choice for LN farmers to grow biomass in their own farmland, then to burn it in a properly LN-heat-sunk heat engine, for the needed power during LN production.

And the LN-heat-sunk heat engine is certainly a LN guzzler, as the tandemized liquefier has to pay back 70% of its output; but without the high ratio feedback, a few of hundreds Celsius degree of biomass combustion is just junk low grade heat source.

There is a critical efficiency to enable LN produced > consumed.

A commercial threshold efficiency for decent productivity should go beyond the critical efficiency by somewhat extent.

If the heat engine's efficiency is unluckily less than the said critical, there will be no LN net gain; else if less than the said threshold, then there is no business sense.

I will publish a separate scholar paper to present details of thermodynamic analysis, derivation, and experiment verification.

Here for convenience, just accept a practical percentage 80% as the threshold efficiency.

Although it's not difficult to reach the at-least efficiency for good net gain with my state-of-the-art heat engine shafting the prior art Linde process liquefaction machine; if using my another proprietary liquefaction machine, it can further significantly increase the efficiency.

Of course, all farmers know the gross harvest must pay back the seed, so if mandating LN as consumable seed for heat sink of heat engine, the liquefaction system has to produce more LN to pay back the seed LN.

Against the law of energy conservation? No, that's a phantom, because no matter mandate or not mandate the seeding LN, biomass is always consumed in the heat engine, just a matter of more or less biomass consumption.

In a humorous sense, farmers are used to the natural relation of seed and harvest, so even no mandate, farmers still love to choose the seed-rooted production system.

§4. Even winter cold air -30°C can still heat LN, why burn gas or biomass?

Yes, -30 Celsius degree air can spontaneously transfer heat to -196 Celsius degree LN, but burning fuel for better performance doesn't mean unnecessary waste or ridiculous farting by depanting first.

Two and one half decisive factors make me to select the non-free fuel.

a. For higher efficiency

Carnot heat engine efficiency η = (TH - TL)/TH, here TH = high level temperature of working medium, TL = low level temperature.

TH is decided by heat source, TL by heat sink.

So it can take both ends advantage to boost efficiency above 80% by using high grade fuel heat source for higher TH & cryogenic heat sink for lower TL, while moderate TH (a few of hundreds Celsius degree) makes material engineering easy.

E.g. if TH = 273 +300 = 573K, then η = (573 -77)/573 = 86%; else if TH = 273 +400 = 673K, then η = 89%.

In contrast, to get same η 86% with atmosphere heat sink TL= 273 +27 = 300K, the TH should be 2143K = 2143 -273 = 1870°C.

What a jump requirement in temperature, from 300°C with LN heat sink, to 1870°C with atmosphere heat sink!

That's why I emphasize on industrialization of LN heat sink production, in parallel importance with heat source production.

Unlike gasoline, biomass combustion flame is hard to reach 1000°C, but enough to heat any working medium to 300°C.

That's why farmers absolutely have the opportunity to join workforce of energy commodity producers, especially a good fit to be LN heat sink producers.

A real world heat engine is always inferior to the ideal Carnot heat engine, so it's reasonably conservative to get a discounted efficiency 80% from ideal 86% at 300°C.

Thermodynamics asserts: heat source can Never convert 100% heat energy to kinetic energy, or in other words, nothing can stop heat engine's partial heat rejection to heat sink.

Most heat engines work in a mediocre efficiency range 20% to 60%, e.g. gas car <25%, diesel car ~30%, and atmosphere is their common heat sink, which is risking of global warming with more and more engines adding to service.

Theoretically speaking, constant accumulation of global heat rejection, or say endless entropy incremental, will eventually trend to heat death of the universe.

Think to use heat pump for entropy decrement of heat sink atmosphere?

Though heat pump users feel comfy & it can save money, that's still futile in sense of entropy decrement, because work is needed to power heat pump, but generating work need more heat, and the temporarily heated medium by heat pump will eventually dissipate all acquired heat to atmosphere; then entropy incremental is furthered.

In my view, it's not the convenient scapegoat CO2, but the low efficiency of too many heat engines in service, which deserve to be blamed for over-rejecting heat to air heat sink.

In fact, CO2 Keeling Curve is in same tread of the everlasting increment of global heat engines quantity, so the surface effect of wrongly blaming CO2 does accidentally reflect the real culprit.

Thus even nuclear power may not be clean, though no CO2 emission, and judgement should be case by case: e.g. if its efficiency is above 60%, then clean; else if efficiency = 30, then not clean, as 70% energy go to heat sink atmosphere, too much!

Hence every heat engine should be responsible for less heat rejection, and work at efficiency as high as possible.

b. For heat transfer speed

LN's thermal conductivity is badly 0.13W/mK, which is < 25% of water performance, so heat transfer speed is the bottle-neck problem.

There are 3 ways to transfer heat: conduction, convection, radiation.

Here the 1st & 2nd ways are very slow, because of medium LN's bad thermal conductivity, unless pay high capital cost for jumbo heat exchangers.

Only the 3rd way can transfer heat by amazing light speed, and radiation flux is exponentially proportional to the 4th power of temperature.

Combustion flame is a radiation source of photons, though not only choice. Not all wavelengths of photons render same heating effect to LN, it depends on the analysis of absorption spectrum.

Luckily this tech bottle-neck can be overcome by my commercial secret of optics-assisted fast heat transfer/sinking, and special designed structure of heat exchanger.

c. One half factor - insignifying or smoothing season influence

This factor is not too much decisive, so I assign it 0.5 factor, but still worthwhile to mention.

It's well known that a car can slightly cost user more fuel in winter, but get better fuel economy in summer.

The science behind this phenomenon:

The temperature ever-changing atmosphere is the common heat sink of all heat engines, include the internal combustion engines in vehicles, so the efficiency will be influenced by seasons.

If use atmosphere to heat LN, of course, its efficiency will be affected.

Only when neither heat source nor heat sink is atmosphere, the efficiency will keep stable.

If vehicles have my LN-heat-sunk engine, with combination of heating or cooling cab, seasonal influence still exists, however, insignificant.

Motor oil for cooling and lubrication will render more resistance in winter; and if feeding cold air, final temperature after compression will be not as hot as feeding warm hot, efficiency lowers.

My design focus on 10x more higher pressure(hydraulic grade) power, so lesser frequent cylinder motion, then lesser lubrication demand.

d. Exception

There is one exception for application of the LN-CCP(Combined Cooling & Power), where cooling is the main purpose, but auxiliary electricity is needed for control interface, thus electricity should be generated in situ, by a compromised air-LN heat engine.

For application of the LN-CHP(Combined Heating & Power), as the expected space temperature is usually higher than outdoor air, and power generation is the main purpose, so high grade fuel is still required.

§5. Air liquefaction can get both LN & LO(Liquid Oxygen)

Once LN becomes a major cheap energy commodity, so will liquid oxygen get wide applications.

During air liquefaction, oxygen, boiling point -183 Celsius degree, the 21% component of air, will be firstly condensed, hence very easy to separate it from nitrogen, then gather the by-product LO, which is sometimes refereed as rocket oxidant.

LN farmers can optionally use the gathered LO to pre-cool air, or to boost combustion performance, so as to reduce or eliminate smoke or the unwanted components e.g. NO, NO2 in flue gas.

Biomass or fossil fuel + LN co-powered vehicles can also optionally equip an auxiliary LO tank, so as to improve quality of combustion & performance of heat transfer & emission, because pure oxygen combustion can render far higher flame temperature.

Both LN & LO don't need expensive high pressure heavy containers, but does need good insulation for long time storage, though evaporation minor loss is inevitable; and usually a good insulated Dewar is moderately priced.

§6. Imagine the would-be 1st generation such car

A typical configuration: 100L LN dewar, 10L LO dewar (optional), 10L gasoline tank, 200Hp optical radiation furnace external combustion engine.

Sorry, the tough biomass-as-fuel should be scheduled as 2nd generation for vehicular application, because fluid fuel can be easily controlled with ready-to-use mature technology.

The future drivers have to buy both gasoline/diesel/heating oil and LN, anyway, compared to gas-only car, they will still pay less, because they can save 70% on gas, of which, even 50% of the saved gas cost can enough cover the LN purchase.

Of course, it seems not to save much if the calculation is based on current LN retail price, because its niche market drives it expensive, unless it's commoditized.

Unlike a full electrified car has to rely on the resource-limited infrastructure of recharging stations, fuel+LN vehicles can quickly take refill of LN anywhere include rural farming districts, even needless of gas stations if the fuel is biomass.

Farmers can distribute their LN produce in nearby city, so no worries about supply chain for metropolitan drivers.

Given: 1kg biomass should match 5kg LN; 1kg biomass is equivalent to 0.5kg gasoline in heat value; LN density 0.8kg/L is on par with gasoline,so I set the LN tank volume capacity to be 10 times of gasoline tank.

Because production of marketable LN has consumed farmers'substantial biomass as fuel, so in a sense, LN can also be treated as a medium of energy storage, with thermal energy density 10MJ/kg, assuming biomass heat value 20MJ/kg.

Therefore, such kind of vehicles should be regarded as true hybrid type.

The efficiency will have a big leap, up to 80% by veneer efficiency, though there is no significant change in core efficiency, circa 25%.

My veneer efficiency concept is appraised under tentative presuming of free LN as heat sink, then only heat value of gasoline is considered.

My core efficiency concept, or say overall efficiency, is appraised under a reasonable equation of total heat value = gasoline' heat value + biomass' heat value that was spent during LN production in farmland.

As a low grade fuel, biomass price is just a fraction of high grade fuel gasoline price, though their heat values render not too big difference, so the core efficiency does not reflect market value.

In contrast, the said veneer efficiency is very close to a meaningful efficiency, and the adjective word "veneer" can be omitted.

Gedanken experiment:

It will make no sense to build an on-chassis LN liquefaction machine for coping with shortage of LN supply.

However if so, then, 25L gasoline by 3 times refilling the 10L tank, will have to be pre-consumed in parking status to make enough LN for filling the 100L LN tank, and then refill the 10L gas tank at 4th time for the final hybrid run, until all tanks are empty.

Last effect: such two procedures will get same mileage range with a gas-only car with 35L tank.

In this case, the veneer efficiency 80% no longer makes sense, but the core energy efficiency 25% is concerned, because no gasoline saved.

Assuming gasoline price = $1.5/L = $2/kg, the total 35L cost = $53 for the 2 procedures.

Given electricity consumption by industrial LN production = 1.8MJ/kg or 0.5kwh/kg, for large scale production, it seems reasonable to let LN wholesale price equal 2 times of electric energy cost:

LN price = 2 * 0.5kwh/kg * 1000kg * $0.1/kwh = $100/ton = $0.1/kg = $1.3/L

So if outsourcing industrial LN to fill the 100L tank, cost = $13, then total cost of the real hybrid drive range = 10L gas cost + 100L LN cost = $15 + $13 = $28; saved = $53 - $28 = $25, OFF rate = $25/$53 = 47%.

As to the farmed LN, no real data, but it can be roughly estimated.

The cheapest grade 3 hay forage, i.e. burnable biomass anyway, is averagely priced at $50/ton = $0.05/kg.

As burning 1kg biomass can produce 2kg LN, i.e. 1L LN need consume 0.4kg biomass, so 100L LN will consume 40kg biomass.

Once again, let me reasonably assume wholesale price of the farmed 100L LN = 2 times of burnt biomass cost = 2*40kg*$0.05/kg = $4.

Or say unit price = $4/100L = $0.04/L.

So if outsourcing LN from a farm to fill the 100L tank, then total cost of the real hybrid drive range = 10L gas cost + 100L LN cost = $15 + $4 = $19; saved = $53 - $19 = $34, OFF rate = $34/$53 = 64%.

Cost share: buy gas = $15/19 = 79%; buy farmed LN = $4/19 = 21%.

What an amazing lot of savings to be seen via computation!

But the purpose of computation is insight, Not numbers. Capisce？

§7. Imagine the first airplane powered by kerosene & LN

There are many benefits to use fuel + LN hybrid engine.

In modern jet engines, combustion temperature is very high, circa 2000°C, and such challenge does frustrate top material scientists and engineers.

The rarest metal Rhenium (melting point 3186°C) has to be applied in jet engine design, but its global supply is in extreme short, and its price is about 4 times of silver.

For same efficiency, a LN-heat-sunk heat engine can decrease the high temperature requirement to less than 1000°C, then material engineering will become easy, even it is possible to replace the expensive aviation kerosene by regular heating oil or the so-called Sustainable Aviation Fuel SAF.

The exhaust yet lukewarm nitrogen will usually expand hundreds times by volume, and this nice pure nitrogen emission around engine' fan can function as a thrust-boosting cushion to improve mach performance.

Liquid oxygen can be a good option in this application.

Not all merits, but a demerit exists: for same flight distance to empty, total volume of 2 tanks is 3 times of current single tank volume, so payload will decrease.

§8. Hesitate how to dispose mailbox spam flyers & shop packing cardboard?

Just wait for the debut of 2nd generation biomass-LN powered cars.

Then you can burn those junk fibers to power your car.

In fact, flyers paper & packing cardboard both are made of wood fibers, so it can be deemed as biomass.

Garden management, tree service, bush clearance, also generate lots of biomass residue.

Maybe the period junk accumulation can supply the same period demand on biomass fuel of your car for daily commutation/transportation.

Perhaps some future vehicle drivers will only need to buy LN, and just use any accessible daily biomass residue to heat LN on chassis.

§9. Imagine the next generation LN-cooled air conditioners & fridges

In the hot summer, the shortage of peak power electricity supply could result in non-affordable crazy hydro bill, or your household appliances fail to work, because too many air conditioners are sucking electric power from capacity-limited hydro grid.

In fact, farmer's LN is indirectly produced by solar energy, and of course, it is also the best energy storage with good energy density & containability & pumpability & portability & transportability.

When LN becomes a major cheap energy commodity, it's the time to let LN directly cool your house and food storage.

But don't pour LN indoor, because it will fatally dilute indoor oxygen concentration, so a safe such product should cool indoor air by circulating LN via heat exchange, then emitting the warmed nitrogen outdoor.

A better LN air conditioner can even generate auxiliary electricity by utilizing parasitic air-LN heat engine.

Consumers only need to periodically buy LN from omnipresent retailers, then refill LN tank for household cooling devices.

In other aspect, all climate activists blame refrigerants CFC or Freon in current cooling equipment for causing global warming, so I wish they will encourage LN replacing CFC as soon as possible.

§10. Imagine LN heating your house in winter

Of course, the highest efficient way of heating a space is to directly burn fuel inside the space; in contrast, regular heating by hydro service can only retrieve up to 40% combustion heat of the remote thermal power plant, in consideration of electricity generator' efficiency and transmission loss.

But burning fuel inside a house will consume massive indoor oxygen, and risks life loss caused by carbon monoxide.

Outdoor furnace can overcome the said risk, but heat exchangers and circulation plumbing will amplify the capital investment, and heating efficiency will decrease.

If convenient LN supply chain and LN-fuel power generators are available anywhere and anyfamily, then why not simply use electrical heaters? then the house owner only need a little bit fuel to trigger massive heat BTU, because efficiency of electrical generator can reach as high as 90%.

For example, in Canada, a house of 2000 sqft usually need 6 cords (1 cord = 128 cubic feet) firewood to cope with typical winter, if heating mainly by wood stove; so with LN indirect heating, only 0.6 cords firewood is needed to generate the same BTU heat, and this small amount of firewood can be cheaply replaced by diesel, waste motor oil, or even yearly accumulated cardboard + flyers + newspaper + magazines for city dwellers.

Although in sense of efficiency, this LN heating is a little bit inferior than direct burning fuel indoor, but many benefits of convenience and easy-controllability and safety and economy can overwhelmingly offset the negligible efficiency disadvantage.

That is why I said "tantamount" in early section.

Usually we may still not satisfy with such high efficiency, because if a heat pump works in tandem, the more desired "overunity" can realize.

Average heat pump can render COP (Coefficient Of Performance) circa 4, in other words, input 1 kwh electricity, can "pump" 4 kwh heat from low temperature side to high temperature side.

Therefore, for the said 2000 sqft house to winterize comfortably, assuming sufficient liquid air supply, you may further reduce fuel supply from the aforementioned 0.6 cords firewood to 0.15 cords or 19 cubic feet firewood.

The Biden administration is going to prohibit residents using natural gas for cook stoves and furnaces, and personally I think it's a stupid policy, though my innovation of LN-indirect-heating can benefit from it.

But LN production need kinetic energy, and kinetic energy is dominantly converted from thermal energy, so I wish Biden's ban could exempt citizens of burning natural gas for power generation with LN as heat sink.

§11. Imagine off-grid autonomy & neighborhood power supply

Farmers don't have to sell all their LN product, instead they can realize off-grid energy autonomy, even supply electricity to neighbors.

The biomass powered heat engine, which shaft is powering farmer's liquefaction machine, can also drive an electricity generator, so as to conveniently power homestead and/or transmit to nearby community.

The neighborhood power supply can be thought as micro-grid, and if the scale is further amplified, small-grid or large-grid can be shaped.

Even insulated LN pipelines are considerable infrastructure for LN-heat-sunk macro-grid aka normal grid, so as to avoid trucking job of farm by farm LN gathering.

This cleantech is specially good for islands, because almost all islands suffer from high price of electricity, e.g. Hawaii average $0.4/kwh in year 2021.

Hydro companies are reluctant to invest too much in building super long distance transmission line from city to remote rural districts, therefore, farmers will have opportunity to fill this market gap.

Such plentiful power supply will eventually usher a chain reaction to boom local economy and labor market everywhere, and there will be no more big difference between cities and farming communities

§12. Future thermal power station no longer has to sit beside big water body

Traditional thermal power stations, such as coal-fired, nature-gas-fired power plants, have to strategically sit beside big lakes or rivers or ocean, just because they all use water as working medium, & high cooling towers with hyperbola shape need massive cold water too.

Future thermal power stations should base on my cryogenic heat sink, not only for ~90% efficiency, but also for smoothing peak and valley time usage, by producing LN during valley time as a special style of energy storage.

In my inventions, nitrogen itself is just the working medium, consumably transiting from -196°C liquid state to 300°C above overheat gaseous state.

Thus needless either big water body or skyscraper of cooling towers.

Although power stations can produce LN during valley time, vicinal farmers still are welcome to produce LN by burning biomass, and farmed LN supply chain should be maintained stably.

Such a power station should be more flexible on heat source choice, i.e. burning coal or nature gas or LNG or biomass etc., each one or combination can be optional; and priority should be given to the non-fossil fuel -- renewable and regrowable biomass.

If a power station does not have enough own farmland, but still prefers biomass to fossil fuel for heat source, the station owner should secure biomass supply from adjacent farming community, and casually outsource LN from nearby farmers for temporary shortage of LN self production or emergencies.

As remote rural community can realize Energy Independence with this same cleantech by its vast farmland, therefore, too large scale thermal power station is not necessary, but should be well tailored to fit its neighboring city only.

If thermal power stations only serve cities, current generation capacity shall be downsized, and expensive long distance transmission cost shall be saved; thinking about the 40% or more delivery fee in monthly hydro bill, end users could save ~40%.

So in a sense, this is the mode of multi-partner distributed power generation, and in essence, most energy come from photosynthesis or say solar energy, even all energy if not use fossil fuel for heat source.

Farmers or hydro users can even use cheap valley electricity to produce LN if their biomass stock is in temporary short, however, later retrieving energy for power from LN, still need to burn something as heat source.

By the way, many local governments are considering or implementing Energy Recovery from the Combustion of Municipal Solid Waste.

But all the said designs simply use atmosphere as heat sink, so hopeless to get decent efficiency; if LN as heat sink in the future design, then big kudos for saving landfills as well as boosting green circular economy!

§13. Imagine the friendly help to LNG preparation

Liquid Nature Gas LNG is very important commodity of intercoastal energy trade, and exclusive liquefaction factories are built to prepare LNG before shipping.

As the boiling point of LNG is -162°C, so the more colder LN can help to liquefy nature gas, and if cheaply farmed LN is accessible anywhere in massive stock, it is possible to upscale LNG export without proportionally upscaling LNG liquefaction factories.

Building conventional LNG liquefaction factories is very expensive investment, however if taking LN advantage for precooling or directly liquefying nature gas, the re-optimized liquefaction process can simplify the technical hard core, then make new hub of LNG preparation easy buildable, as well as new hub can save major energy consumption.

By the way, as to end users of LNG, e.g. nature gas power plants, they don't have to preheat LNG into gaseous state at indoor temperature, without extract of work; because in my new invention of heat engine, LNG alone can simultaneously play three roles: cryogenic heat sink + fuel + working medium, so as to output more kinetic work.

§14. Imagine the early coming of superconductor applications

The critical temperature of synthesized material Y-Ba-Cu-O for superconductor is 92K or -181°C, which environment can be cheaply provided by liquid nitrogen.

Superconductor can be used in many fields, such as magnetic levitation, lossless electricity transmission, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) etc.

Motivated by omni-accessible dirty cheap LN, superconductor will be explored of many potential residential applications.

With up to billions dollars support all over the world, scientists are still working hard to find superconductor material that could work in normal indoor temperature.

Though an aggregate of LN itself is the best long duration energy storage in my eyes, other means are still demandable, e.g. Flywheel Energy Storage (FES) which was stymied because of significant friction loss.

Luckily enough, plentiful LN supply will reinvigorate the high energy density FES by utilizing affordable magnetic levitation for zero friction.  

If LN becomes a big staple of commodity, the huge expenditure in researching new material can be saved, and researchers interest & motivation can quickly shift to then focus on superconductor applications.

§15. So it's obvious: LN shall become major energy commodity

Can so many above imaginations & scenario visualization make readers to believe that LN shall soon become major energy commodity?

I think it should do.

As per previous analysis, in a LN-heat-sunk heat engine with 80% energy efficiency, during combustion of 1kg gasoline, 10kg LN will be consumed.

Or in other words: the LN consumption is 10 times more than gasoline.

So in the future, if everywhere can see hybrid vehicles of gasoline + LN, or heating oil + LN + battery, the energy supply market will be shuffled significantly.

As efficiency is increased 3 times, so for same mileage or transportation demand of consumers, the future demand of gasoline, will shrink to 30% of current market capacity, and LN demand will be equivalent to 10/3 = 3.3 times of current gasoline market demand.

Gasoline is undoubtedly recognized as big staple commodity, so there is no reason to deny future LN, a 3.3 times more demand than nowadays gasoline, is not a major energy commodity.

Above estimation even skips the consumable LN direct cooling or refrigeration market without CFC refrigerants, which is also huge!

§16 Common sense: ash can boost biomass growth

Burning biomass for LN production, will generate lots of residue ash.

Farmers can use the by-product ash as a good fertilizer containing high concentration of potassium, so as to improve topsoil quality and farmland fertility, then they can harvest more biomass in forthcoming years.

Large scale ash return to farmland can reduce fertilizer usage, especially save major potassium fertilizer, and conserve soil moisture.

§17. Double produce: economic crops + LN

Even the prospect of farming LN is good enough, farmers don't have to self-restrict with a Hob's Choice of farming LN only, unless they are obsessed with impression of those corrupt apparatchiks, then feel no obligation to feed the swamp.

Farming LN and farming economic crops can seamlessly synergize together under well management.

Most economic crops have major biomass in stalk or straw, e.g. corn, soybeans, sorghum, wheat, rice, cotton, hemp, etc.

In comparison with inedible energy grass, farmers can have more income stream for same size farmland.

§18. Biomass + sunshine hybrid or sunshine only to produce LN

Biomass of plantae is created by photosynthesis with a fractional solar energy utilization %1 or so, and within favorable seasons to grow.

But don't contempt the natural primary productivity with 1% solar energy utilization; It is just the special 1% that is supporting the trophic pyramid of Earth ecological system.

In fact, promoting biomass-for-LN is not attracted by its abundance as energy source, but by making environment neatly sustainable, landfills less usage, farmland fertile via potash quasi-autonomy, and food security reliable.

Thus, biomass + realtime sunshine hybrid is more favorable for purposing extreme LN productivity, and/or power generation, as well as reserving food security & biodiversity, though farmers need more capital invest on solar thermal concentrators, solar trackers, and peripheral interface.

But for desert regions, and non-agri-zoning area, sunshine-only is good & moral enough for massive scale LN production.

As Earth surface area = 4 * solar project planar area on Earth, the solar constant 1361 W/m^2 is yearly averaged to 1361/4 = 340 W/m^2.

By a reasonable assumption on my LN-feedback-looped tandem of heat engine and liquefier, about 20% of the said average thermal power is converted to kinetic power = 340*20% = 68 W/m^2.

For electricity generation only, yearly sellable energy = 68*24*365= 596 kwh/m^2; else for LN production only, as per 0.5kwh for 1kg LN, yearly sellable LN = 596/0.5 = 1192 kg/m^2, or say one more ton liquid air harvest per square meter per year.

As air density 1.2kg/m^3, so just imagine 1000 meters high air column get cleaned via cryogenic purge of pollution every year.

§19. Good for economy, employment, de-urbanization, social stabilization, fair resource allocation etc.

Where there are abundant energy, where there are hopes & vigor.

High density of population is not good for life quality, even bother with epidemic prevention; and some experts hint that urbanization may test positive as one of many factors for global warming.

The root energy do come from the shining Sun, and it fairly throw solar energy at peak 1000w/m^2 to everywhere, with zero discrimination on city or rural by the natural universal love.

Once this breakthrough technology get commercialized, people don't have to crowd in resource-limited cities, and there'll be no more hillbilly elegy.

To flatten the 3D density geographic curve of population distribution, government should encourage rural districts to subdivide big land into moderate size for market supply, so as to facilitate urban population shifting to rural.

Social stabilization is determined by what level of social fairness and justice, and accessible omnipresent plentiful energy can contribute positive points.

When buy a battery, buyers pay both positive and negative poles, sounds fair.

Unless swindled by pseudo-science of perpetual motion machine or magic heat engine without heat sink, no matter how high temperature, nobody believes a heat source alone generating any power, just like battery positive pole alone cannot output electricity.

So when buy then use a heat engine powered gas vehicle, I think it's unfair to only pay heat source fuel, but no pay to the common heat sink -- i.e. the atmosphere.

Now the carbon tax is enacted by government.

To my best innerstand, the carbon tax is just the payment to the common heat sink.

But carbon tax is never a smart choice, even foolish!

Why not pay farmers to produce LN as heat sink for all heat engines?

Even the carbon tax in one liter gasoline may buy 2L or more the farmed LN, which is equivalent to 0.5L gasoline in my special design of heat source - heat sink power generation.

Once biomass can be conveniently burnt as heat source in mobility application, then farmers can play two major roles: heat source producer & heat sink producer.

As a trade-off transitional best solution: let oil diggers continuously be the heat source producer, but gradually minimize its demand down to about 30% by my cleantech; let farmers be the heat sink producer.

As this disruptive technology inventor & pioneer, I feel the obligation to define a new concept for above roles play: New World Energy Order (NWEO) based on the Cryogenic Heat Sink Revolution (CHSR), and will proudly usher its forthcoming.

But don't confuse it with the bad New World Order in my humble opinion, which is promoted by those deep state puppets; I prefer Building Forward Better through technology evolution to Building Back Better through political correctness.

With such unprecedented insights, my laboratory incorporation will pursue the best Environmental-Social-Governance (ESG) criteria.

For the common good of humankind, it's the high time to prepare the first step for the well defined CHSR.

And so it is!

§20. Reform agriculture tax & regulation

Farm income tax should adapt to the evolution of LN farming technology.

Once technology getting mature, farming LN farmers will call upon reforming agriculture-tax-return forms, biomass burning bylaw, and carbon tax credit.

Because LN farmers can indirectly reduce CO2 emission by tons and tons per year, so they deserve commensurable carbon tax credit.

Canada tax form T2042 - farming activity, a snapshot:

Current bylaw allows farmers to conduct open-air fire by applying permission, as long as proper weather permitted & good care taken.

Future bylaw should be revised to encourage farmers feed most unwanted biomass to combustion chamber of the special heat engine that powers the air liquefaction machine for production of LN & LO.

For short stub of crops, open air burning seems not too bad, as long as main biomass is properly disposed / utilized, though without mechanic power output, whatever size open air burning, from small wild fire to large forest fire disaster, is equivalent to ruthlessly dump all heat to the vulnerable heat sink atmosphere.

But don't create a new quota system on the emerging liquid air agribusiness; Most Canadian farmers hate current quota systems.

For example, Canada government still imposes price tag $36000 per kilogram butterfat per day on dairy farmers, or roughly say, for every one cow milking capacity, farmers have to pay $36K to the oversize bureaucratic group with many idling agents enjoying sunshine-list salaries.

A free LN market is good for healthy circular energy economy.

§21. Change practice of cultural burning to clear cut for fueling air liquefiers

In many indigenous cultures of Canada, fire is a sacred and powerful element that can help on landscapes and in ceremony, and it becomes a practice that annually burning some selected bushes or forests by a manageable program, even given a nice nomenclature: cultural burning.

So theoretically, cultural burning is a good fire, even can prevent forests from wild bad fire.

But this pristine practice could be compromised by mismanagement or sabotage by bad guy.

This year is a terrible year of coastal to coastal great outburst of wildfires in Canada, and we have to endure the smokey sky and badly polluted air, in most of summer time.

Following is the said yet sad wildfires map:

Some speculators doubt whether the black hats of deep state ignited this summer disastrous wildfires by infiltrating team of cultural burning, or even arson by DEW (Direct Energy Weapon) from sky, though they are often labelled as conspiracists by mainstream media.

And every year, lots of trees will be trimmed by horticulture or destroyed by bad weather conditions of icing rains, storms, etc., these will bring out huge mess: if by natural decay on open air, it needs decades to hundreds years while occupying immense space, even thousands to millions years to become fossil if buried underground, so don't only complain that plastic garbage in landfill will cost hundreds years to decay.

So cultural burning seems necessary to cope with the mess, and I still believe the cultural burning is good prescribed fire; however, once my farming liquid air invention is matured, I do wish to persuade practitioners change cultural burning to new practice of clear-cut or culling for fuel of air liquefiers.

Clear-cut or culling of forest for production of liquid air will also create many job opportunities in circular energy economy.

Conclusively, combustion then converting its heat to energy is the best way to fix the mess of forest.

Hot money has long been flowing to PhotoVoltaic, WindVoltaic, Electric Vehicles, etc, with consumers crushed by high carbon tax, just in pursuit of fighting global warming, but, but, but unfortunately one large scale wildfire may reset all those decades efforts to zero!

So, smartly managing forests, and adapting to my breakthrough invention, this new methodology is far more worthwhile to implement than whatever other so-called Green New Deal.

§22. Pre-process raw biomass by shredding or other means

Combustion chambers love small pieces formatted biomass aggregate.

Autofeeding unit usually uses auger to transfer stuffs from position A to position B, and also desire materials ready-shredded as proper size.

So pre-process must be done for big chunks of raw biomass by shredder or whatever other good methods.

Supposedly, energy consumption of pre-process is not a big deal.

This picture shows the biomass pellets in burning.

Biomass formatting is not for good looking, but for easy dispensation to combustion chamber, so no standard to mandate, the best format should be case by case depending on system design, even a log splitter could be used to format tree trunks for a special system.

As a rule of thumb, the smaller the formatted size, the higher the cost in energy consumption, though still in auxiliary level.

§23. Impact on other biomass energy

There are many other types of biomass energy utilization, such as corn ethanol, biomass pyrolysis for biofuel, anaerobic fermentation for biogass, etc.

Of all choices, burning biomass is the simplest one, and with the creative LN-heat-sunk heat engine, half of biomass heat value can deposit in the net-gained LN product; in excellent return, off-farm LN-consuming heat engines, can convert 80% of heat value of fuels other than biomass, into mechanical energy.

That's awesome, and no other biomass energy utilization can reach such performance!

For example, extracting ethanol from corns will leave most biomass waste, though ethanol is high grade fuel, which heat value is just 2 times of regular biomass -- not too brilliant anyway; biodiesel and biogas have similar problem.

Conclusion: farming LN is the majestic energy solution of once and for all, or say Where We the farmers Go One, We the people Go All.

§24. Impact on Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES)

In fact, LN or LA itself is a special form of energy storage - LNES or LAES, which is similar to the CAES, using same principle element.

Although LN can directly contact with atmosphere, however its condensation in past time did experience hundreds of atmospheric pressure, which is far higher than a practical full charged CAES; so LNES has higher density of energy: about 10MJ/kg as per prior analysis.

Unlike LNES, CAES definitely need super high grade pressure tank, and all governments enact strict bylaws for safety to regulate such class of tanks, so its cost could be prohibitively high for large scale CAES, e.g. the bankrupted Lightsail Energy, who spent $80M venture capital, used to reinforcing tanks with expensive carbon fibers.

Releasing energy from CAES usually need extra heat to go an isothermal process, some cases by waste heat, some cases by high grade heat; otherwise efficiency is unacceptably low.

It's easy to get 500 bar pressure(≈10x peak cylinder pressure of typical diesel engine), by dropping LN behind piston then overheating it up to 300°C; but CAES pressure is often capped to circa 100 bar; thus LNES can be built far more powerful, with cheaper cost per kw.

Therefore, once LN-based Circular Energy Economy is established, there will be no market for CAES, the old school sibling of LNES.

Even for all enumerable kinds of energy storage, it is hard to find a better one than LNES.

§25. By the way to mention non-energy applications

a. Healthcare

It is reported that many Indian patients died of shortage of LO supply during COVID pandemic.

Heartbroken for that tragedy, that won't happen if the vital liquid oxygen became cheap major staples produced by farmers.

b. Others: food industry, recreation, entertainment, education etc.

Too frivolous, out of energy theme, forgive me to skip it.

§26. Considerable strains of energy grass for LN farmers

a. Miscanthus

Photo credit to: Brittany Patterson

"I just wish we could use these lands in a little bit more productive way", West Virginia University brilliant professor Jeff Skousen said.

This energy crop don't need substantial investment on fertilizer and crop maintenance, even nothing input seems okay for a few of years, as it is like wild grass, with little touch of intrusiveness.

The max harvest can be as high as 15 tons dry matter per acre, and LN harvest after burnt all dry matter could be 30 tons LN per acre.

If LN sold at $0.05/kg, then gross income rate = $1500/acre.

In contrast, the gross income of corn crop is about $743/acre, soybean $450/acre; after deduct the heavy investment on fertilizer & cropping job, then net income is quite undesirable, even negative in a bad year, e.g. corn -$47/acre, soybean -$86/acre, as per 2019 data from reference #10.

Therefore, if technology and market permitted, farmers will have enough motivation to pursue more profitable energy crop.

b. Switch grass

Photo credit to: Leslie Boby

The biomass harvest rate is similar to the miscanthus.

c. Biden's Pelosi, sorry typo, Bidens Pilosa, invasive, may not too good

Photo credit to: Solana Thraia

This would-be energy grass may be embarrassingly a woke grass, as it's so bad grifter who monopolize massive nutrient & solar energy, and leave no chance for nearby other plants to survive.

In one word: they don't know the harmonious rule of ecology circle - live and let live!

Nowadays,this nomenclature: woke politicians, woke oligarchs, woke general, woke scientists, etc, are often appearing in news headline, so don't wonder why there is a woke grass in plant world.

I am glad to see that there are more and more people all over the world, especially pristine farmers, eventually have a rude awakening, and now they know how to identify whatever woke guys & woke stuffs.

The good aspect is: farmers don't have to sow seed every year for all invasive strains of plants, so labor & cost can be saved, then just concentrate on harvest & drying in the fall season.

d. Agricultural residues

Although most economic crops have major biomass in stalk or straw, however the ratio of residue mass to core value mass can disperse in a wide band.

To my best knowledge, cotton crop seems render very high the said ratio, as its stalk is very thick, but the dried cotton is very lightweight.

Wheat and sorghum also leave heavy residues, really good choice for LN co-farming in most agriculture zones.

§27. Interface with other renewable energy

a. Photovoltaic (PV) energy

I don't support PV to be integrated with farmers' LN production line, because it's large scale installation will bock underneath plants from photosynthesis, and will deteriorate soil fertility after a few of years.

In fact, those burnt biomass in LN production line do function on par efficiency with PV, so PV no longer necessary.

As 1kg sellable LN have consumed 0.5kg biomass, which heat value = 0.5kg*20MJ/kg = 10MJ, and 1kg LN production need 0.5kwh or 1.8MJ shaft work, therefore the working core efficiency = 1.8MJ/10MJ = 18%.

In comparison, the top quality PV is 20%, but very rare yet expensive in market, and most so-so PV panels is just 13% in efficiency, with agreeable price.

That's why I feel PV no longer important after this subject cleantech successful in the future.

Even though, independent technical interface can still be done by PV-powered electric motor with speed control.

In fact, photonic energy aka light energy, is a special form of thermal energy, so from my special viewpoint, PV can be treated as a special quasi heat engine, which efficiency could be doubled or tripled by cryogenically cooling its base plate of silicon crystal.

I did not conduct the experiment yet, just a theoretical speculation, maybe pollyannaish?

At least, a peer-reviewed science paper claimed PV efficiency doubled by LN cooling, check the reference #9 in the last section.

b. Solar thermal

Although I feel PV no longer important in context of efficiency comparison, however solar thermal energy can be utilized by optical concentration, so as to get 500 above Celsius degree.

Now that said temperature is on par with biomass combustion, so in a LN-heat-sunk engine, converting realtime sunshine by 90% veneer efficiency is no longer a dream.

If LN is not produced by burning biomass, but by solar thermal energy alone, then after discount of the LN feedback, the core efficiency can still reach 20% to 30% fair efficiency, far better than PV.

As to solar salt, it can also be used here, so that surplus solar heat can be cached to a storage for night use, though it is extra big investment.

If no solar salt phase-change storage, then biomass can be used on-demand, but the hybrid heat sources need an interface for convenient switching.

Biomass growth only utilizes a fraction of solar energy, so biomass + solar thermal hybrid for LN production is definitely a good choice.

c. Wind energy

The wind energy can play good with farmer's LN production line, despite it is intermittent.

Method of liquefying air is tricky: air compression from 1 bar to hundreds bars usually need 2 or more stages, and power-demand differential is huge between start and final; so transmission should be smart enough to cope with, especially for unstable energy, e.g. wind.

An automatic transmission can be used to couple with the driving shaft of liquefaction machine, or can charge battery energy storage, then use electric power to drive it.

For the direct mechanic drive interface, my previous invention can help:

a switching-mode hydraulic power supply with adaptivity to wide range of input pressure change 100 psi ~ 5000 psi, and 3 working options of constant power, bucked or boosted constant pressure, constant flow-rate, just like a mechanical version of the modern switching-mode DC-DC power supply.

I name above gearless automatic transmission, or say smart hydraulic power supply as Wei-Trump powertrain, just in commemoration of Trump's diversity-envisioned energy policy.

d. Hydrodynamic energy

The interface is in same simplicity with wind power.

e. Geothermal energy

Temperature of power utilizable geothermal resources is about 200°C, and many nowadays heat engines for geothermal energy run in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), so its efficiency is as ugly as about 10% with atmosphere or separate cold well as heat sink.

Although special formulated organic working medium can have boiling point far lower than atmosphere, it still cannot be regarded as heat sink, unless consumably using great quantity of medium with hope of easy regeneration or production, however nobody is affordable for massive consumption of expensive working medium.

With my LN-heat-sunk heat engine innovation, ORC or other Sterling-type heat engine can be phased out of geothermal power, and let LN as both heat sink and working medium, heated by hot water from deep underground.

Just like using biomass as heat source to farm LN with seeding LN in rolling-up production style, geothermal resource owners can also be LN producers by using their free hot water as heat source.

For purpose of power generation or combined heat & power, geothermal resource owners can either buy cheap LN from farmers for heat sink, or independently produce LN, but not sell it, then consume it as heat sink to generate electricity in rolling-up generation mode.

§28. Side-possibility to capture carbon and more goodies

Many frenetic actions are taken to sequestrate CO2 all over the world with bountiful funding support, such as carbon mineralization, seal in underground cavern, etc.

For on-farm LN production, it shall be a viable idea to capture CO2 into dry ice during liquefaction process, because of higher freezing point of CO2.

As to off-farm applications, LN-heat-sunk heat engine may have the side possibility to capture CO2, though intentionally doing so will interfere with working efficiency more or less; so not worthy to do that.

One thing is sure and positive to efficiency: flue gas of biomass combustion can be used as prior heat source, as its heat grade is still good for cryogenic working medium.

There's about 10% of gross heating value of biomass in combustion product, i.e. water vapor and CO2, the main stuff in flue gas, and almost all nowadays heat engines cannot make use of the said 10%, because it's low grade heat for atmosphere-heat-sunk heat engines.

Even this extra reclaimable 10% heat value may be on par with the heat value of ethanol refined from the same biomass.

Another goody: thoroughly cleaning global air.

In fact, air liquefaction-gasefaction endless cycle can thoroughly clean surface atmosphere, remove all pollutants and virus.

The global crude oil production is about 4.2 billion tons BT, and coal 7.9 BT per year.

If two third production of fossil fuel is slashed by LN commodity market share, then the height of cleaned air per year can be roughly solved from bellow equation:

4 *3.14 *6371000^2 *height *1.2kg/m^3 * 72% = 10 *(4.2 +7.9) *10^12

height = 0.27 meter = 27 cm per year, and this average height should project to all points on surface of Earth, include ocean, polar zones, or geometrically it is like as a spherical shell with 27 cm thickness.

Above equation is based on the 1:10 as the ratio of gasoline tank volume to LN dewar volume in a typical gas-LN hybrid vehicle.

§29. Forefront runners in current R&D

I appreciate the UK-based company HighviewPower' great progress in this domain.

In their official website, they proudly claim: "Our CRYO platform technology is ready now".

Picture: Manchester UK opens grid-scale LN energy storage facility.

Congratulations!

It is a centralized energy storage feasible plan, which focus on big utility clients to utilize off-peak surplus electricity for LN production as energy storage, then release the energy by LN-heat-sunk heat engine driving genset for feeding on-peak grid.

However, it does not comply with my LN-based economy cycle concept of the distributed farmland LN production for supply chain & everywhere LN consumption for HVAC and power generation.

There is still a long way to realize my macro plan.

§30. Activate this circular energy economy by consortium

Although I can draw the blueprint for LN-based circular energy economy, even could disclose the details of my commercial secretes, e.g. the improved Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) with triple intakes: LN + LO + gasoline, however, there would be none automaker who dare to commercialize it, because there will be nowhere to economically refill LN & LO.

Also there would be none farmer who dare to massively produce liquid air with my cleantech, because just now, no large scale consumption market.

Liquid air is volatile, evaporation can expand 695 times in volume, so no lossless tank can store it forever, and a low cost Dewar tanks may suffer from ~1.2% loss per day; thus if shelf time is over 3 months, original full tank will become empty.

A high cost quality cryogenic tank may lose merely 0.15%/day, so shelf time could be two more years, but it's not economical.

Whatever quality storage tank, it's better to let cryogenic liquid be consumed before its boil-off loss under 10%; otherwise too much energy will be wasted.

Only a healthy circular energy economy can make transient storage time of cryogenic products as short as possible, so as to avoid significant loss.

With random development, this flourishing circular energy economy will most likely deadlock, unless a proper activation is set up, and multiple players must involve in the pre-warming consortium to coordinate standards & progression.

I, or other more qualified expert, can be the convener of the consortium, and theme equipment makers + those big CO2 emitters can take leading role therein, as well as agriculture ministers can represent farmers.

Governments should take the staging cost to thaw the deadlock for the common good of humankind.

If government not to pay the staging cost, then don't follow the model of circular economy in the first phase of development, but simply let farmers develop alone as electricity producer, i.e. feedback all produced LN from liquefaction machine to heat engine as consumable heat sink, only for purpose of scaling up the capacity of power generation, so as to have plentiful energy to drive commercial genset.

But government has to allow then facilitate the farmed electricity to feed in hydro grid for a decent price.

Waiting until LN-based hybrid vehicles, or cryo-air-conditioners / cryo-fridge ready to market, and encourage farmers dismount gensets then focus on LN production to meet new shaped circular energy economy.

§31. How to catch credit in this history-making cleantech evolution?

To start this newest real-net-zero economy cycle of LN production & LN consumption, smart strategic investors, and government agencies should first support me teamworking with farmers & farming communities in transition to farm LN2 by large scale as a major energy commodity.

The early bird gets the worm; so waking-up people can catch your credit in the next energy revolution.

Even a simple like emoji or share or comment on this article can be a good trace of credit; if I get inspired by your opinion, no matter appreciation or critique, you will be thanked in in my future achievement reports; or if recommendation to decision makers has sped the R&D progress, there are kudos to you; and the big financial or value-added idea contributor could become the NWEO co-definer with me.

§31. Last but not least, please ruminate on these slogans:

If you ate today, thank a farmer!

Farmers feed cities!

Some day in the future, some new slogans will appear:

If your liquid nitrogen cooling air conditioner works great, thank a farmer!

If your gas & liquid nitrogen hybrid car runs at 100 MPG, thank a farmer!

As this cleantech creator, I don't mind my name not mentioned in any beautiful slogan.

Reference:

1. Trudeau government targets grain growers as worst emissions offenders

2. AOC explains why ‘farting cows’ were considered in Green New Deal

3. Factsheet Biofuel Decision Support System

4. Power-plant-a-grass-might-generate-fuel-and-help-fix-damaged-mine-lands

5. Bidens pilosa — Wikipedia

6. Highview power

7. Manchester opens LAES facility

8. Switching-mode fluid power supply + Continuously Variable Transmission + regenerative brake

9. Micron-sized liquid nitrogen-cooled indium antimonide photovoltaic cell for near-field thermophotovoltaics

10. Weekly Farm Economics Release of 2020 Crop Budgets, Revised 2019 Budgets, and Up-dated Revenues and Costs

11. Planting and Managing Giant Miscanthus as a Biomass Energy Crop

11. What is Cultural Burning?

12. Indigenous Fire Practices Shape our Land

13. GOOD FIRE: REVITALIZING CULTURAL BURNING

14. The art of fire: reviving the Indigenous craft of cultural burning

15. Cultural fire management council

16. Indigenous fire stewardship

Citation by DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19969976.v1

For special interest group or publisher, I am open to solicitation of a tailored version.

For hardcover book lovers, watch the forthcoming publication with ISBN: 978-1-7750809-1-6; This more detailed version may have about 200 pages, and price is to be determined.